![]() ![]() ![]() Thus, according to the aforementioned, ability to pay principle of taxation sounds more equitable and easier to be applied and succeed. Moreover, benefit principle of taxation is less likely to be applied successfully because individuals who need and receive the government benefits are less likely to be able to pay taxes like The old and individuals with disabilities. Which is unfair because it might be a burden on taxpayers who receive the government benefits but do not have the financial capacity to comply with the taxation system. It does not consider the financial condition of taxpayers. On the other hand, benefit principle of taxation principles imposes taxes on taxpayers according to the benefits they receive. This principle consider the financial condition of taxpayers rather than the government benefits they receive. The benefits received principle of taxation asserts that people and businesses who receive the benefit of a good or service financed by taxes should pay the tax. Which indicates that high-income taxpayers should be charged for higher taxes than low-income taxpayers. Ability to pay principle of taxation levy taxes upon taxpayers according to their financial ability to pay. According to the benefit principle of taxation those who reap the benefits from government services should pay the taxes. The benefits-received principle of taxation refers to a theory of income tax fairness whereby citizens who use or benefit from certain government goods and services pay taxes for them in equal. I think that ability to pay principle of taxation is more equitable than benefit principle of taxation. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |